This is where I publish original measurements of Nepali websites and search behaviour: data I collected, with the sample, the date, the method and the limits stated. It is not a round-up of other people's statistics.
How the studies are done
- Public data, collected passively. Page fetches and response headers — what any browser receives. No scanning, no probing, no logins.
- Sample and date, always. Every figure says how many sites, from which sectors, and when it was measured.
- Limits are published. Each study says what it cannot see; homepage-only measurements are labelled as such.
- Aggregates where naming would expose someone. The government security study publishes counts only, not domains.
- Corrections are dated and visible. When something I published turns out to be wrong, the article says so.
Datasets
| Study | Sample | Collected | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technical SEO audit of 34 Nepali websites | 34 websites, seven sectors | 23 Aug 2026 | Study · JSON · Collection script |
| AI crawler policy in robots.txt | The same 34 websites | 4 Sep 2026 | Study Counts are published in the article; the raw file was not retained. |
| Security headers on Nepali government websites | 30 .gov.np domains | 5 Sep 2026 | Study · JSON Aggregate counts only; individual domains are not published. |
| Nepali-language content and sitemaps | The same 34 websites | 5 Sep 2026 | Study · JSON Aggregate counts by sector. Also used in the sitemap study. |
How to cite
Bhatt, D. (2026). Title of the study. diwakarbhatt.com.np. Please link to the study page rather than to a copy of the figures, so that any correction reaches your readers too.
Found a problem?
If you can show a figure is wrong, or you ran the same method and got a different result, tell me. A study that cannot be checked is not worth citing.
